For a year now, starting from July 2025, JSC “State Joint Stock Company“Automobile Roads of Ukraine” has been implementing a policy of systematicinventory of movable and immovable property of the Company’s subordinate roadmaintenance companies, with the aim of its effective use in the process of operationalmaintenance of public roads – both state and local.
And in the event of a lack of assets, especially in terms of specialized road equipmentand special mechanisms, it conducts official inspections of subsidiaries (SEs) in orderto search for missing equipment, the state of preservation of vehicles that arerecorded as available, as well as the appropriateness of the fulfillment by officials oftheir duties regarding the effective management, accounting and preservation ofmovable property assigned to the SE.
Based on the information received, not only management decisions are maderegarding SE officials, but also active work is being carried out with relevant lawenforcement agencies.
Only since the beginning of this year, the management of JSC “State Joint StockCompany “Automobile Roads of Ukraine” initiated the submission of a significantlist of statements about the commission of criminal offenses to:
National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine;
Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine;
Security Service of Ukraine;
Department of Strategic Investigations of the National Police of Ukraine;
regional prosecutor’s offices.
Continuing to purposefully protect assets, the owner of which is 100% the State ofUkraine, the Company’s management sent a new “Statement about the commissionof a criminal offense, establishing the location and searching for vehicles and specialequipment of SE “Poltava Oblavtodor” to the Prosecutor General’s Office.
About 400 units of equipment and special mechanisms – this is exactly the terriblediscrepancy between the number of equipment recorded on the balance sheet of theSE and its actual presence was established by members of the special commission ofJSC “State Joint Stock Company “Automobile Roads of Ukraine” based on theresults of the Service Inspection. There is currently no confirmation by relevantdocuments of the transfer or other legal movement of this equipment.
The members of the Commission formed a list of missing transport and specialequipment, which was also sent to the Prosecutor General’s Office as an appendix tothe Statement on the commission of a criminal offense.
At the same time, an official inspection established circumstances that require a thorough investigation by law enforcement agencies of possible illegal actions andthe commission of a criminal offense by relevant officials of the Poltava OblavtodorState Enterprise regarding the property of the State Enterprise and an immediateprocedural response.
The above-mentioned actions of the former heads of the Oblavtodor State Enterpriseand third parties associated with them cannot be called anything other than a seriouscrime and looting during the war.
The actions of state-owned enterprise employees who allowed the loss of specializedmovable property of an enterprise that was supposed to work in the interests of theState, and the heads of private companies who became beneficiaries of theimplementation of criminal schemes for the free use of state property, must receive a legal assessment and punishment provided for by law.